Talk:-olus
Regarding the RFV:
I can attest that there are a very large number of scientific names in which the "-olus" ending is used for diminutives of adjectives rather than nouns, but the pattern does seem to be almost entirely restricted to adjectives ending in "-eus" - e.g., luteolus, brunneolus, argenteolus, cupreolus, and many others, the one exception being "helvolus". 138.23.68.20 22:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Latin. Tagged by GuitarDudeness on 24 January 2018, not listed:
“If not from -lus added to nouns ending in -ius or -eus, is there proof of free use of this suffix?” J3133 (talk) 06:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- It's pretty clear that -olus is an allomorph of -ulus, and not a distinct suffix: their distribution is predictable and comeplementary aside from the variation between o and u after u/v (as in aquula~aquola~acula, servulus~servolus) which is not specific to this suffix (it's the same phenomenon as the variation between vulgus~volgus) and which does not indicate any difference in meaning. We presumably should still have a page at -olus, but whether or not it should just redirect to -ulus with a full explanation on that page is a question of preference.--Urszag (talk) 22:22, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have edited the usage note to make the answer to the posed question clear, so I'm removing the RFV. The entry now makes clear that -olus is an allomorph of -ulus. I think it's clear that the entry shouldn't just be deleted, given the presence of descendants and so on; whether it should be rearranged somehow doesn't seem like a question for RFV.--Urszag (talk) 20:32, 13 January 2023 (UTC)