Talk:AWB
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Ruakh in topic RFV discussion
RFV discussion[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense: AutoWikiBrowser. Probably not citable. -- Prince Kassad 11:03, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- It's WMF jargon. It doesn't have to be citable. --Yair rand 22:52, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Really? Where's that policy (not sarcastic, I really wanna see it). Mglovesfun (talk) 22:54, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- It's not an official policy, AFAIK. --Yair rand 23:05, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- I don't really like the WMF jargon entries. I prefer what we've done at (deprecated template usage) IRC, where there's a special link to a relevant page that doesn't pretend to be part of the everyday dictionary entry; perhaps we could do something like this for those entries in the WMF category, linking to a glossary or something? Equinox ◑ 23:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- It's not an official policy, AFAIK. --Yair rand 23:05, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Really? Where's that policy (not sarcastic, I really wanna see it). Mglovesfun (talk) 22:54, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, there is this. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 23:57, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- So it has to be cited outside of WMF projects. I didn't realise this was a fictional universe, but hey. Mglovesfun (talk) 06:38, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, there is this. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 23:57, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
RFV failed, sense removed. —RuakhTALK 11:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC)