Talk:pok-pok

Is this a real entry or should it be deleted? — Hippietrail 05:16, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)

yes it is an entry

Yeah, it is an entry. Sorry for the slow response

From RFC

This article has been de-wikified from when I last cleaned it up out of good faith. The has also been more words added to the article that should be in there own articles. Please see history for this article.--Williamsayers79 08:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

The article need to be fixed again I tired once and I'm not an admin so I've posted here for the admins to see.--Williamsayers79 08:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Should those other terms be listed under ===See also===? Or are they just other insults, completely unrelated? --Connel MacKenzie 15:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes, ===See also===. I’ve re-wikified it. —Stephen 14:56, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

It's not necessary to be an admin to do what you've requested, is it? DAVilla 14:09, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

This is a perfect example of why, in actuality, Wiktionary should never have a new-article policy like Wikipedia, or at least never one that's stricter than the article editing policy. I've moved the descriptions to the respective pages, making proper entries out of them. DAVilla 14:09, 7 October 2006 (UTC)