Talk:radde
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense: Chaucerian past participle of rede. The past participle of read is not really in doubt. This, that and the other (talk) 10:12, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Chaucer stuff tagged as Webster 1913 should just be converted to Middle English. W1913 did not distinguish between OE, ME and ModE. Equinox ◑ 10:25, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Still needs checking in EEBO to sift through all the pasts of read. This, that and the other (talk) 05:15, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
I've checked the EEBO results of radde and apart from early printings of Chaucer I found only one (probable) case of rede, at Citations:radde. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 20:18, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Good, thanks for that. RFV-failed This, that and the other (talk) 09:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)