Category talk:Esperanto 1894 Universala Vortaro
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Mglovesfun in topic Deletion debate
Deletion debate[edit]
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Category:Esperanto 1894 Universala Vortaro[edit]
In that case, I nominate the category. It would be like having a category for all the words in the first edition of Merriam-Webster -- pointless. The Esperanto Official Basic Roots (BRO) does at least take the place of Category:1000 English basic words nicely.
- Added the category to the title of this header. Razorflame 17:56, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- No keep. This is different as its a constructed language, and we're talking about the first official dictionary. It seems dictionary-worth and specific to me, I can see several reasons to keep it. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe we can move the contents of the category to an appendix? Razorflame 20:10, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- No keep. This is different as its a constructed language, and we're talking about the first official dictionary. It seems dictionary-worth and specific to me, I can see several reasons to keep it. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- Any language with an official reference of every word in the language should denote "official" words in some way.--Prosfilaes 15:06, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- Kept, I also suspect that Razorflame nominated this because of his dispute with Opi. Furthermore, he has no support of any kind. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:11, 29 May 2010 (UTC)