Category talk:Terms making reference to character shapes by language

Can this be reconciled with Category:English terms derived from the shape of letters? —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 03:33, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

@Suzukaze-c: Yeah, that'd be good. Do you have a suggestion for the name of the category? — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 03:36, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

I can't think of ways to word it elegantly and translingually (trans-scriptually???). —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 04:19, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

@Suzukaze-c: "Character" seems to be fine across scripts, right? — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 04:30, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

I guess it is, but "letter" seems more natural for English. —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 04:35, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

@Suzukaze-c: That is true. Perhaps we should bring this discussion to WT:BP. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 04:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Hearing more opinions would be good. —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 19:42, 2 November 2018 (UTC)