Citations:postquel

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

English citations of postquel

  • 1995 December 9, Michael Wolf, “Re: Sequel too???”, in rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc[1] (Usenet):
    I heard that Lucas will shoot all three of the prequels at the same time (like the last two Back To The Future movies were filmed together). The first prequel is shooting for '97 or '98 release. As to when the 'postquels' will be written, shot and released is anybody's guess. I just hope that George sticks with us long enuf for us to complete this amazing storyline.
  • 2001, Charles Marowitz, Stage Dust: A Critic's Cultural Scrapbook from the 1990s, Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, →ISBN, page 23:
    In musicals, when they are not unabashedly revivals, the assumption seems to be all we need do is find appropriate chunks of recent, or not-so-recent, history and cleverly reformulate them. Remakes, re-dos, sequels, prequels, and postquels are all the rage in films, TV, and on the stage.
  • 2002 June 3, BballJunky, “Re: My 5 thoughts on AOTC”, in rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc[2] (Usenet):
    Wouldn't the galaxy be in chaos? Most systems would still have military leadership from the Empire around. Who will emerge as leaders of both sides? Surely the biggest battle of the war had been won, but it would take time to break down the rest of the Empire that is scattered about. It could make for an interesting "postquel".
  • 2004 April 14, Peredur Davies, “Re: New James Bond novels - what do you want to see?”, in alt.fan.james-bond[3] (Usenet):
    I'm not saying we should see "The Return of Goldfinger" or "Bond has more fun with Honey Ryder", but it would be a fun and interesting way toi use a Bond that was the same age and time as Fleming's character, without having to resort to prequels, postquels, or parallel universes.
  • 2005 March 14, Angus Rivers, “Re: The story goes on and on...”, in rec.arts.sf.written.robert-jordan[4] (Usenet):
    The prequels, then the completed 12 (or 13) ring cycle, then lots of questions. Then more prequels, and, Lord save us please, the postquels, short stories and fillers. Pray for more quality, since quantity alone is assured.
  • 2015, Randy Laist, “Ambiguous Origins in Star Wars: Episode IThe Phantom Menace”, in Cinema of Simulation: Hyperreal Hollywood in the Long 1990s, New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing, →ISBN, page 199:
    But The Phantom Menace applies a hyperreal twist to its familiar emphasis on postmodern allusiveness in that the film it most obsessively alludes to is its own postquel: Star Wars Episode I is a distinctly post–Star Wars movie. [] In the process, the prequel/postquel duo comes to orbit one another like a binary star system, leaving behind referentiality altogether to reflect only each other in a bottomless mise en abyme.