Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/dʰelbʰ-

I added the primary source. The LIV puts Germanic *delfaną and Balto-Slavic *delbtei under a *dʰḗlbʰ- ~ *dʰélbʰ- (acrodynamic root present? / Narten root present?), but Kroonen reconstructs *delfaną as dʰelbʰ-e- and Derksen reconstructs *debtei as dʰelbʰ-, so how should I sort these? @Victar Greenismean2016 (talk) 22:10, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Well, for one, a lot of these BSL entries are secondary formations. Maybe @Rua can clean it up. --{{victar|talk}} 22:28, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

@Rua, no interest? --{{victar|talk}} 19:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Not at the moment, I've been preoccupied with Slovene. —Rua (mew) 19:51, 17 June 2019 (UTC)