Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/werǵ-

I just noticed there is a page where for *werǵ- given descendant OCS vragu. Is it probable? —Игорь Телкачь 15:44, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

That Slavic word is listed in Appendix:Proto-Indo-European/wérǵom. I don't know if it is correct. --Vahag (talk) 17:25, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

According to Derksen (527) PIE word for *vorgъ (“foe”) is *(h₁)uorg-o-. Also i noticed that PIE ǵ (can) give z in Slavic (e.g. *zьrno; при и.-е. *rēǵ- ожидалось бы слав. *rězъ). Here is Deksen etymology for some words (i replaced Germanic descendants by PG):

• PS *vergti (“to throw”) from PIE *uergʷ-. Cognate with PG *werpaną (“to throw; to cast”). See also: *vьrgnǫti (“to throw”).
• PS *vьrša (“fishing-basket, fishing-trap made of osiers”) from *urǵ-. Cognate with PG *werką (“work”). See also: *versъ, *verskъ (“heather”).

If there is PS *vьršiti and it comes from *vьrxъ then:

• PS *vьrxъ (“top, upper part”) from PIE *urs-u-.

Looks like only *vьrša is suitable for *wérǵom. —Игорь Телкачь 19:40, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Ваш английский не очень понятен. Если Вы не против, перейдём на русский. Я удалил добавленные безродным IP славянские рефлексы *wérǵom. Правильно ли я понимаю, что по Дерксену вершить и иже с ним не происходят из *wérǵom в любом случае? --Vahag (talk) 20:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Я не старался разжёвывать. Вы верно убрали неподходящие слова в статье *wérǵom. —Игорь Телкачь 12:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

The page գործ (gorc) says it comes from non-ablauting Appendix:Proto-Indo-European/wérǵom. Anyone know it got -o- instead of -e-? — This unsigned comment was added by 72.211.140.51 (talk). 04:32, 06 September 2018 (UTC)

See Martirosyan 2010, page 227, for an explanation. --Vahag (talk) 09:17, 4 December 2018 (UTC)