Talk:√
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 70.172.194.25 in topic Translingual status of linguistics meaing
Translingual status of linguistics meaing[edit]
In case the Translingual nature of the definition ever comes up for debate, I've only seen √ used this way in English text. As a side note, I've mostly seen it in on Wikipedia and Wiktionary, so it may be WMF jargon. —The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 06:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- @The Editor's Apprentice Do you mean the linguistics definition, or the mathematical?__Gamren (talk) 12:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Gamren In my previous comment I am referring to the linguistics definition. Separately, and for the record, I have since seen √ used in the linguistics sense described at the entry outside of Wikimedia Foundation websites like Wiktionary and Wikipedia suggesting it is not unique jargon. —The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 03:32, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, I only just noticed the header. D'oh.__Gamren (talk) 13:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Gamren In my previous comment I am referring to the linguistics definition. Separately, and for the record, I have since seen √ used in the linguistics sense described at the entry outside of Wikimedia Foundation websites like Wiktionary and Wikipedia suggesting it is not unique jargon. —The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 03:32, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
User:The Editor's Apprentice, User:Gamren, I added citations. There are a lot of 20th century ones but searching is difficult. Some OCR changes it to V, which is how I found some. 70.172.194.25 04:36, 11 April 2022 (UTC)