Talk:

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Justinrleung in topic RFV discussion: January–July 2021
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: January–July 2021[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Rfv-sense: "early dawn". Tagged by @Geographyinitiative but not listed here. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 17:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

[1] Definition [名] 日色、日光。 and the examples are 「晨曦」、「曙曦」. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 00:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Not found in major monolingual dictionaries. Looks like it was copied from the unicode definitions. RcAlex36 (talk) 09:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
曦 xī <书>阳光(多指清晨的):晨~。Xiandai Hanyu Cidian, Edition 7, page 1403, column 1.
曦 xī 名 <文> 日光▷晨~|春~。 Xiandai Hanyu Guifan Cidian, Edition 3, page 1404, column 2.
曦 (xī) 日色;阳光。(followed by literary examples) Cihai, Edition 6, page 2461, column 3.
【曦】日-16-20注音 ㄒㄧ漢語拼音 xī釋義日光、日色。例晨曦、朝曦、曙曦[2]
釋義 [名]日色、日光。如:「晨曦」、「曙曦」。(literary examples) [3]
Based on this information alone, it seems like removing "early dawn" as a definition is the objectively correct move since the only definition for 曦 seems to be covered by the first definition "sunshine; dawn sunlight". If that decision is made here, I think Unicode should be informed.
--Geographyinitiative (talk) 21:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
The sense "early dawn" is also not found in Hanyu Da Zidian, Hanyu Da Cidian or 王力古漢語字典. Not sure if it's a sense used in other languages that use CJK characters, so I'm not sure if we should inform Unicode necessarily. (And the Unihan database is riddled with errors or imprecision anyway, so I'm inclined not to bother with contacting them about it because they're not really a dictionary.) — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 22:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply