Talk:紅茶婊

RFV discussion: February–March 2023

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

紅茶婊

紅茶婊 should be cited (Citations:紅茶婊). — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 17:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

• RFV passed. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 21:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

聖母婊

@Wpi31: I've added some quotes at Citations:聖母婊. Please check them over to see if they're under the right senses. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 17:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Anyhow, this should be cited. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 01:57, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

• RFV passed. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 21:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

咖啡婊

奶茶婊

龍井婊

Chinese. Perhaps protologisms. A few thousand ghits, but the first few pages I skimmed over are all content-farmy articles simply listing these and explaining their meanings, and there does not seem to be much actual usage. (Note: I find 綠茶婊 to be reasonably attested, and it's not in the scope of this rfv.) – Wpi31 (talk) 04:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

咖啡婊, 奶茶婊, 龍井婊 RFV failed. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 02:58, 26 March 2023 (UTC)