Talk:Gramophone
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
"(obsolete) A brand of phonograph that introduced disk records." So it's the w:Gramophone Company? Ultimateria 00:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- Might now be attestable in accordance with standards for company/brand names, because of genericized gramophone. DCDuring TALK 13:49, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- I only know it as a classical music magazine. Would that be OK? SemperBlotto 13:56, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- That's still a brand. Maybe that sense would meet brand attestation in some context. DCDuring TALK 14:01, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- Also, the Grammies are (or were) short for Gramophones Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 02:18, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
- That's still a brand. Maybe that sense would meet brand attestation in some context. DCDuring TALK 14:01, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
moved to RFV -- Liliana • 11:10, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Rfv-sense: (obsolete) A brand of phonograph that introduced disk records. If it's what I think it is, it needs cites in accordance with WT:BRAND. -- Liliana • 11:09, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- This was originally a trademark, but I'm more used to seeing it in lower case in modern use. -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 19:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- I don't see any capitalized uses that don't specify that the term is being used in relation to a product of a gramophone company. bd2412 T 01:31, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 19:13, 1 October 2012 (UTC)