Talk:benched
Wikipedia Edit History[edit]
This page was m:Transwikied from Wikipedia. Below is the edit history for the Wikipedia article.
- Time: 2005-06-12T19:40:25Z - By: w:User:62.254.0.32
- Time: 2005-06-12T19:52:13Z - By: w:User:Niteowlneils - Comment: {Move to Wiktionary}
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Adjective: (US sports) substituted (so has to sit on the bench)
Past participle, not adjective. See Wiktionary:English adjectives and bench#Verb. DCDuring TALK 13:05, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- The definition we have is "(US, sports) substituted (so has to sit on the bench)". A more general sense of "sitting on the sidelines" sees an 1830(!) cite: [1]. [[Wiktionary:English adjectives]] includes the following test: "Can it modify a noun in attributive position (before the noun)? Only adjectives and nouns can." Is that accurate? Does a benched player not use benched as a past participle? If it is accurate, then there are sufficiently many cites (search for "a benched player").—msh210℠ (talk) 15:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- O the irony. --Mglovesfun (talk) 16:04, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed. The many (???) authors and readers of the page seem to have missed that.
- We could say that "adjective" functions can be performed by words of many types, but the lexicographic class at Wiktionary is reserved for words meeting some specific criteria designed to prevent needless and hard-to-maintain duplicative content, without doing too much violence to the understandings of language professionals or, especially, normal users. I'm no language professional and viewed Wiktionary:English adjectives as a draft to be improved in the wiki way by others. What it is the customary way of distinguishing adjective as functional role and as lexicographic category? Is there another way to look at it that makes it all clear? DCDuring TALK 19:34, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- O the irony. --Mglovesfun (talk) 16:04, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- Deleted and striking. It does seem redundant to the verb by our tests. Equinox ◑ 15:22, 18 December 2011 (UTC)