Talk:carbon nanotube
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFD discussion: July–August 2017
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Does it quality to have an entry? Yurivict (talk) 17:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
- I would keep this, but I find the reasoning hard to put into words. I suppose it is a translation target for single-word foreign equivalents, and a synonym for the existing buckytube. bd2412 T 16:16, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Carbon nanotubes were the original nanotubes, so it is possible that the term carbon nanotube predates the independent term nanotube, in which case I would keep. Otherwise it is probably SOP, there are lots of specific nanotubes. - [The]DaveRoss 11:20, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Wyang (talk) 11:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- RFD kept. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 07:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)