Talk:fulth
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Kiwima in topic RFV discussion: October–November 2017
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Leasnamisms? Any evidence that these words have been used? Equinox ◑ 07:52, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- fulth is a Scottish word. It's also Scots. It's also in Century. that's where it came from. Leasnam (talk) 18:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- We have Scots available as an L2 header, you know. As you also should know, Scots citations don't count for attestation of English definitions.
- Century is not definitive about the legitimacy by our standard of the archaisms that they include. You do include a references header and link to Century in such entries, don't you? DCDuring (talk) 12:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- @DCDuring:, I do now. Back then, no one had a problem with it, so I didn't think to. How much of my current work is of the sort that causes fuss ? Do you really expect me to remember all the pages I have created and go back and check them ? That's crazzzzy, there are hundrrreds if not thoussssands of them Leasnam (talk) 14:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- If only there were some way of finding one's contributions during a given time period. DCDuring (talk) 15:44, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- @DCDuring:, I do now. Back then, no one had a problem with it, so I didn't think to. How much of my current work is of the sort that causes fuss ? Do you really expect me to remember all the pages I have created and go back and check them ? That's crazzzzy, there are hundrrreds if not thoussssands of them Leasnam (talk) 14:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
RFV-resolved Removed one uncited entry (which was not very different from sense 1), kept the two cited entries. Kiwima (talk) 19:11, 18 November 2017 (UTC)