Talk:good-natured
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Rising Sun in topic Request for deletion
Request for deletion[edit]
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
The OED has both good-natured and ill-natured, a., but I'm unconvinced that they aren't SoP (being good or ill + natured, adj. ("Having a nature or disposition (of a specified kind)."). What do others think? — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 13:59, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- I'd hesitantly say keep because it's rather strongly idiomatic, and it only refers to people (or their behaviour). The nature of food could be good (I suppose?), but you'd never talk about good-natured food. Update: (deprecated template usage) goodnatured means it passes per WT:COALMINE, right? Equinox ◑ 20:29, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it's a single word so keep. Ƿidsiþ 12:55, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Fairy snuff. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 13:15, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- keep then, COALMINE wins --Rising Sun talk? contributions 08:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)