Talk:iudex non calculat
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFV discussion: December 2020–February 2021
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Latin. Tagged by 2003:de:373f:4069:b534:361e:8aeb:9907 on 22 December, not listed: “google books for "iudex non calculat" sunt didn't bring up something Latin”. J3133 (talk) 04:10, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- GBS indicates the collocation is found in several reference books of Latin citations.[1][2] This simply means it has been used by some writers; although this uses are likely a transparent sum of parts, the fact that there are at least two sources suggests the possibility that the maxim is an idiom, and without consulting the sources we cannot be fully sure. --Lambiam 15:38, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- The 2nd work gives two sources:
- "Digesta 49, 8, 1 §2, Macer"
- "Pseudo-Paulus, Sententiae 5, 5 a, 11"
- As for the 1st: juraeinmaleins.de and de.WP give Macer Dig. 49, 8, 1, 1 as source. Digesta Iustiniani Augusti, 49, 8 mentions Macer and has calculi error, error computationis but (as far as I see) doesn't have iudex non calculat. --幽霊四 (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- The 2nd work gives two sources:
- RFV-deleted. No evidence of idiomatic use. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 19:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)