Talk:joint account

RFD

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

This was tagged RFV years ago and never listed... but frankly the fact that it's a [[joint]] [[account]] seems more pressing. - -sche (discuss) 01:53, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Keep the banking definition, it's idiomatic because you have to somehow now that it is referring to a join (bank) account, ax the other one.Lucifer (talk) 01:17, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

One could have a joint account at a any financial institution or indeed at many non-financial institutions. Indeed an account of a married person at any vendor is a joint liability of the married couple. At most, wording like "such as a bank account" is warranted in the absence of evidence that joint account much more frequently means "joint bank account" than account in the applicable sense means "bank account". DCDuring TALK 22:53, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Does joint imply married, then?

Keep. This isn't just an account that's held jointly, it's a type of account where both parties are known and have defined access, restrictions, and liabilities. I could share an email address with a business partner, but that wouldn't be a "joint account". DAVilla 01:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

On the contrary, that would be a joint account / joint e-mail account. - -sche (discuss) 22:47, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Kept. Note that a sense is still tagged with RFV. — Ungoliant ^(Falai) 03:39, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

RFV

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

Rfv-sense. Tagged years ago but not listed. Might be in widespread use, in which case, feel free to wave your hand at citations and de-tag the entry... - -sche (discuss) 04:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Is this article durably archived? If so, that's one. --Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 00:56, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Deleted. The sense was SOP, anyway. - -sche (discuss)