Talk:negatum
RFV[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
rfv of the English section
Definition:
- Lua error in Module:parameters at line 95: Parameter 1 should be a valid language or etymology language code; the value "US" is not valid. See WT:LOL and WT:LOL/E. Used to show disagreement or negation; no.
This sounds pretty implausible, but I tried to check, anyway. It's apparently a term in Indian philosophy, and it's real hard to filter out all the Latin text, so I bogged down after going through a hundred or so Google books hits. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:59, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- I've added two noun senses and converted the RFV to an RFV-sense as a result. I can't find any attestation for the challenged sense. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 03:27, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- It must be a hoped-for alternative to negatory#Adverb. Why is it under a Particle PoS header? DCDuring TALK 15:31, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- RFV failed. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 20:15, 5 April 2015 (UTC)