Talk:nero

RFV discussion: April 2017–May 2018

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

nero / Latin

Seems to be a misspelling of Nero. -84.161.56.85 19:37, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

In which language do you think it is a misspelling? In Finnish it isn't [1]. --Hekaheka (talk) 10:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

I checked the edit log. The anon contributor has tagged the Latin section. --Hekaheka (talk) 10:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

I don't think it's considered correct to spell agnomina (which are after all proper nouns..!) with a lowercase initial letter. So this almost definitely should be deleted, and since this has been here for nearly a year anyway I think this may already count as RFV failed? — Mnemosientje (t · c) 03:01, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Well, it could be a valid un-normalised Middle Latin spelling. The Mediaeval Germanic Hildebrandslied (File:Hildebrandslied1.jpg) for example spells proper nouns with a regular lower case letter as hiltibrant (sometimes looking like hiltibraht) and hadubrant. But if it is Mediaeval, than there should be a label and maybe a usage note. -84.161.52.159 07:41, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

I've now removed it as it's long enough unattested (more than a year!) and was probably created as wrong form of Nero. -84.161.1.61 22:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)