Talk:nogg
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV in topic RFV discussion
RFV discussion[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Nothing obvious on Google book search. (We have several reasonable definitions for (deprecated template usage) nog, but not this one.) SemperBlotto (talk) 19:55, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- Failed. I could find this, but it doesn’t appear to be the entry’s sense. — Ungoliant (Falai) 13:29, 20 September 2013 (UTC)