Talk:ratihabeo

Does the verb exist? Not in Lewis and Short, not in Gaffiot, only attested as a derivative ratihabitio, "ratification". --82.113.48.2 10:02, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

RFV discussion: August 2019–February 2021

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

Latin ratihabeō

(Notifying Fay Freak, Brutal Russian, JohnC5): @Lambiam Appears to exist only as a noun ratihabitiō. Benwing2 (talk) 17:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

@Benwing2 Again you forget that Latin was used after antiquity. In this case it exists in legal writing of the Modern Age. Fay Freak (talk) 22:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Medieval, many instances in googelbooks. Brutal Russian (talk) 12:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

RFV-kept, there's a cite. — surjection ⟨??⟩ 09:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

I added several more citations so this now has more than three (as a procedural thing, so that it passes regardless of how many citations are required for modern Latin and when "modern" is considered to start), indeed, it now has six. - -sche (discuss) 11:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)