Talk:reference implementation

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Equinox in topic reference implementation
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


reference implementation[edit]

implementation of reference. -- Prince Kassad 10:19, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

No idea, I haven't a clue what it means. I've now read the Wikipedia article and I still don't know. --Mglovesfun (talk) 15:55, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Keep; implementation of reference means nothing to me; if you used that phrase I would have no idea what you meant. Even in this context, it took me a while to understand that you meant it to mean the same thing as what I understand to reference implementation mean. If you said "the implementation that is to be referred to while implementing of the standard", then you would clearly referring to the reference implementation.--Prosfilaes 19:20, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
It means nothing to me, and upon reading the entry, it means the same. Is it too much to ask to have entries written in a style that educated native English speakers can understand them? Mglovesfun (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
So fix it. I can't fix it, because I have no clue what your problem is. I gave an alternate definition in my post; what don't you understand about it?--Prosfilaes 23:25, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Keep. The def requested for deletion: "A software example of a specification, intended to help others implement their own version of the specification or find problems during the creation of a specification." I find the def lacking a bit. I would propose this def: "A piece of software that implements a specification of requirements and whose main purpose is to help in creation of other software implementations of the specification by serving as a point of reference rather than being put to productive use." If I am not the only one who likes my def, feel free to place it to the entry. --Dan Polansky 15:03, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Kept; not emended. Please continue to discuss its emendation. I'm not striking this section, but am detagging the entry.​—msh210 (talk) 16:50, 30 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Stricken. Equinox 22:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply