Talk:so-and-so

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 5 months ago by -sche in topic RFD discussion: January–December 2023
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Pronoun?[edit]

I'd have called this a pronoun as well as a noun. I'm not sure now. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:52, 16 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

What usage makes you call it a pronoun? DCDuring TALK 16:42, 25 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

such-and-such[edit]

Isn't the second meaning synonymous with such-and-such? Secondly, why no determiner use is added, unlike those of such-and-such? --Backinstadiums (talk) 11:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

RFD discussion: January–December 2023[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Rfd-redundant — This unsigned comment was added by 81.5.38.43 (talk) at 07:41, 8 January 2023.

The sense targeted by the IP looks like it's a synonym of such-and-such. DonnanZ (talk) 10:27, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
I think the complaint is that sense 2 ("Some thing or things") is redundant to sense 1 ("A placeholder name for a person or thing"), in which case I agree, delete, or merge. such-and-such has "placeholder or generic thing", which might be a better definition. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 13:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Nothing for that sense in Collins and Oxford hard copies, but I notice it crops up in phrases like "at so-and-so a" (time, place etc.) which could be replaced by such-and-such. Probably best described as non-standard. A quote or two would be useful. DonnanZ (talk) 17:06, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Delete/merge sense 2 into sense 1. - -sche (discuss) 23:49, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Merged. - -sche (discuss) 00:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply