Talk:undercooked

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kiwima in topic RFV discussion: August 2021
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: August 2021[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


  1. Insufficiently cooked.
  2. Not overcooked.

RFV sense 2. It is doubted that this exists distinctly from 1. See also Wiktionary:Tea_room/2021/August#undercooked. Mihia (talk) 08:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

I agree. Sense 2 is highly dubious and should probably be removed. Overlordnat1 (talk) 01:06, 11 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
I disagree. Sense 2 would be used in a positive manner- see "perfectly undercooked" on Google Books for examples. DTLHS (talk) 01:42, 11 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
I’ve actually changed my mind now you’ve mentioned that, there are some very convincing examples of ‘perfectly undercooked’ where ‘undercooked’ is used in sense 2. I was expecting to see examples where ‘perfectly undercooked’ meant ‘completely undercooked’ with sense 1 of undercooked rather than ‘ideally undercooked’ with sense 2 of ‘undercooked’ but I was wrong. Overlordnat1 (talk) 11:37, 11 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
It seems to me that the "perfectly undercooked" examples relate to people who like food cooked very lightly. So, if someone likes their broccoli "undercooked", that would, I think, be different from liking it "not overcooked", which to me strongly includes "cooked to the usual/normal extent". I think the actual cooking outcome of "perfectly undercooked" is probably consistent with #1, just that the perception is not that it is insufficient. If we need a separate sense for the positive connotation, perhaps "lightly cooked" or even "very lightly cooked" might be better. Mihia (talk) 11:42, 11 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
It’s definitely not sense #1 IMO but you’re right, ‘(very) lightly cooked’ would be a better definition than ‘not overcooked’. Overlordnat1 (talk) 19:03, 11 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Irrespective of the outcome of this RFV, it seems to me that such a sense does exist, so I have added it. The first two senses now read:
  1. Insufficiently cooked, so as to be unpalatable or inedible.
    I can't eat this chicken – it's undercooked.
  2. Very lightly cooked.
    The broccoli was nicely undercooked.
Mihia (talk) 19:56, 11 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Looks good to me. — SGconlaw (talk) 12:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

RFV-resolved. (Passed as amended). Kiwima (talk) 01:12, 15 August 2021 (UTC)Reply