Talk:usor

RFV discussion

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

usor

A Latin neologism meaning "user". This seems to be pretty recent, and I've also seen usuarius, but I don't think that either of those is citeable. Note that we interpret the CFI to require 3 uses for a Latin term only used in medieval times or later, like hamaxostichus. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 17:16, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

usor tends to be used fairly regularly on the Latin Wikimedia sites (eg. Vicipaedia, Victionary, Vicimedia), although I can't find any outside usage. It's probably idiosyncratic.

On another note, I found this interesting discussion about whether usor or usuarius should be used. - Znex (talk) 22:14, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Failed. Hate to be the executioner of an important WM term, but if it’s uncitable, it’s uncitable. — Ungoliant ^(Falai) 11:26, 12 September 2013 (UTC)