Talk:vigour
Request for verification[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Verb? Was it really, or just a poetic nonce somewhere? --Connel MacKenzie 13:50, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- b.g.c. suggests that (deprecated template usage) vigo(u)red did exist, but I'm not finding too many uses as a real verb; and the uses that I do find don't seem to have this sense. (I'm really not sure what's up with them.) Still, it's in a few dictionaries — we got it from “vigor”, in Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary, Springfield, Mass.: G. & C. Merriam, 1913, →OCLC. — so it probably warrants fuller examination. —RuakhTALK 16:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Clocked out DCDuring TALK 16:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
RFV failed, verb section removed. —RuakhTALK 16:32, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
(U.S.) legal validity or force --Backinstadiums (talk) 12:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)