Talk:werre

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 3 months ago by This, that and the other in topic RFV discussion: June 2023–February 2024
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: April–June 2023[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Middle English only? Wonderfool April 2023 (talk) 08:27, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply


RFV discussion: June 2023–February 2024[edit]

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


Old English. Not in any of the sources I checked. The user in general seems a bit clueless. — SURJECTION / T / C / L / 06:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Not sure why you said that but I did not make anything up, the Old English form was already on the wiki for war, I just put it directly for more (useful) information. Nightcore8365 (talk) 22:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Nightcore8365 Which wiki? The Old English wiki is not a reliable source. Benwing2 (talk) 06:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
en.wiktionary.org, entry war, possibly influenced by etymonline.com — This unsigned comment was added by Nightcore8365 (talkcontribs).
OED says "Late Old English (c1050) wyrre, werre"; one cite for each spelling is provided from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. MED skips the Old English etymon entirely and also includes the "Peterb.Chron." quotes in its own entry. This, that and the other (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
This entry seems legit enough, but @Nightcore8365 what reason did you have for not just creating the entry with a single definition line:
  1. war
? Since the term itself is very late and very rare, having four senses seems unworkable. This, that and the other (talk) 11:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

RFV-passed and cleaned up This, that and the other (talk) 00:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply