User talk:Illustrious Lock

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 2 days ago by Illustrious Lock in topic புருவம்
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome[edit]

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

  • Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
  • Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
  • Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
  • If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
  • If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
  • Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
  • You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! Vis M (talk) 05:51, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Valid language names[edit]

Illustrious Lock, you can only use valid language names as headers. Do not move Reconstruction:Proto-Dravidian/piṯu again. --{{victar|talk}} 07:42, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

It is not a Proto-Dravidian term; it is a Proto-South Dravidian term. Illustrious Lock (talk) 08:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
We do not currently recognize Proto-South Dravidian as a valid language on the project, and until it is, entries can not be created with that header. You can find a relevant discussion here: User_talk:AleksiB_1945#Proto-Dravidian_entries. --{{victar|talk}} 08:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Better delete it Illustrious Lock (talk) 08:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Deleting pages and RfDs[edit]

Pages need to go through an WT:RfD process for them to be deleted. Do not simply delete pages, especially if they have an already active {{rfd}} on them! If you remove another Rfd, like you did here today, you will face a block. --{{victar|talk}} 20:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reason for this edit?[edit]

Do you mind explaining why you deleted the translations in this edit? Thanks. Brusquedandelion (talk) 18:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don't know. It was looking cluttered; that's why I did it. You may undo it if you want. Illustrious Lock (talk) 02:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

புருவம்[edit]

For Tamil, it may be phonetically regular to have a word like bhrū rendered as puruvam, but in case of Old Kannada, bhrū -> purvu definitely is not regular for a borrowing! Old Kannada has a lot of Sanskrit loans and these are borrowed as they are, along with their original pronunciation. But it seems purvu was borrowed in a proto-stage and then subject to Dravidian phonology and then inherited. So this word existed at least at the stage of Proto-South Dravidian or Proto-Tamil-Kannada. Also note how the Malayalam reflexes have a diverse variety, which is fairly typical in Malayalam in inherited words (IMO). So if Old Kannada and Malayalam are inherited, it makes sense to put Tamil as inherited too, in my opinion. I agree it need not be all the way to Proto Dravidian, but at least PSD or Proto-Tamil-Kannada would do. -- 𝘗𝘶𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘺𝘪(𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬) 04:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Maybe, but it has to be reconstructed by some verified linguist first. Illustrious Lock (talk) 07:40, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sure, but it doesn't stop us from saying it came from some intermediate PSD form - without actually reconstructing it, like I did at ಹುಬ್ಬು (hubbu). -- 𝘗𝘶𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘺𝘪(𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬) 08:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
It could be Proto-Tamil-Kannada also since other SDI langs don't have it. For now, don't add any unsourced stuff. Illustrious Lock (talk) 16:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Same with sahasra and raajan AleksiB 1945 (talk) 14:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply